View Mobile Site
Text Size: Smaller Larger Normal

Farmers disappointed in TPP withdrawal

• Leaders fear ag exports will decrease

Farmers disappointed in TPP withdrawal

Wayne Zipser


POSTED February 1, 2017 9:58 a.m.
Share on Facebook Bookmark and Share

In his first Monday in office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to withdraw the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement, a move which left some local growers feeling apprehensive as to what comes next.

"In the last several years we've had good, strong trade agreements agriculturally speaking with Pacific Rim partners," said Stanislaus County Farm Bureau Executive Director Wayne Zipser. "We are hoping that the administration comes up with a substitute agreement that would be favorable to agriculture."

Zipser, a Ceres High graduate, said that California growers have benefitted especially from strong trade negotiations with Pacific Rim partners and that he and other growers are a "little nervous" as to what the other members of the TPP's reactions to the United State's withdrawal will be.

"The number one crop in Stanislaus County is almonds. Walnuts are really close behind. Those are strongly traded products in the Pacific Rim and those are things that we are really looking at," said Zipser. "We're hoping that doesn't change anything as far as our trade because it is a high demand product. We are hoping the stability of the market stays intact because it took years to build."

The California Farm Bureau Federation, which represents more than 48,000 members statewide as part of a larger nationwide network of more than 6.2 million Farm Bureau members, expressed disappointment in President Trump's decision to withdraw from the TPP trade agreement, calling for continued efforts to break down barriers on agricultural trade.

"Trade in food and farm products benefits both rural and urban areas of California," said CFBF President Paul Wenger, who farms in Modesto. "For example, farm products represent the top export from the Port of Oakland, and agreements such as the TPP would allow us to reach more potential customers in key Pacific Rim markets."

After withdrawing from the TPP, Trump said that next steps are to pursue "bilateral trade negotiations to promote American industry, protect American workers, and raise American wages." As for the CFBF, Wenger said he hopes the administration will follow up with policies aimed at opening foreign markets for American farm products.

"We operate in a world where it's much easier for crops from other nations to enter the U.S. than for American farm goods to be sold elsewhere," said Wenger. "We will encourage the administration to work on smaller-scale agreements that would allow American farmers to trade with other nations on an equal basis."

Wenger noted that the administration also discussed reopening the North American Free Trade Agreement with Canada and Mexico.

"If NAFTA is reopened, its agricultural provisions should be left alone," said Wenger. "We don't want successful agricultural trade to be caught in any conflict about other portions of the agreement."

 

 

Enter a Comment:

You must be logged in to post comments.
http://www.cerescourier.com/ encourages readers to interact with one another. We will not edit your comments, but we reserve the right to delete any inappropriate responses.

To report offensive or inappropriate comments, contact our editor.

The comments below are from readers of http://www.cerescourier.com/ and do not necessarily represent the views of The Newspaper or Morris Multimedia.

1 comment
DavidEHSmith: 10 months, 2 weeks ago

TRUMP'S CORPORATE USA & MAY'S CORP. UK PROTECT TAXPAYERS from MASSIVE TREATY/'ARRANGEMENTS' LITIGATION;

WHO'S NEXT TO EXIT? The Basis for Investment Litigation (the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Canada-China Investment Treaty, CETA, et al); Suing the Global Corporate Economy.

'The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of America, the Trans-Pacific nations, the EU, Canada, et al
v. The harmless Canadian NON-shareholders, et al, both; Native & non Native'.

1) The most vulnerable Aboriginal Canadian community members (95% - 99% of Aboriginal Canadians) are being deprived of the due diligence information regarding the criteria for ascertaining the health & robustness of an Native Canadian community's economy.
2) A psychologist agreed that there is a relationship between the DEPRIVATION of the aforementioned information
and
the unconscionably high rates of SUICIDES, etc. that are found in many of the Aboriginal communities across Canada.
3) As a consequence of being deprived of the aforementioned information the most vulnerable Aboriginal Canadian community members, et al, are entitled to be Compensated as per The W.A.D. Accord.
4) The most vulnerable NON-Aboriginal Canadian community members (95% - 99% of NON Aboriginal Canadians) are being deprived of the information regarding the most vulnerable Aboriginal community members' deprivation the aforementioned criteria
and
are forced to pay billions for the NON criteria based Native enterprises that are unhealthy & which prevent the most vulnerable Native community members from obtaining the benefits of their robust economies.
5) As a means of avoiding, &/or, diluting any, &/or, all of corporate Canada's contribution to the aforementioned Compensation, corporate Canada is, & will continue, to pay considerations (lobbying) to the government of Canada via the executives of the political parties operating in Canada, et al, to promote the development of the superseding secret Tribunals of the present treaty 'arrangements' which have been designed to punitively punish the harmless Canadians non-shareholders, both; Native & non Native...
***
Please consider SHARING the enclosed INFO with 10 friends, family members, &/or, business associates who tell 10 others, etc...
*** FULL Article, see;
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com
or,
Google.
B) 'The MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued',
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com
or,
Google.
C) Excerpts from 'The Submission' to The Supreme Court of Canada:
'The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of AMERICA, the Trans-Pacific nations, the EU, Canada, et al
v. The harmless Canadian NON shareholders, et al, both; Native & non Native'.
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com
or,
Google.
For the FULL 'Submission',
see; The Supreme Court of Canada,
or, contact David E.H. Smith at:
austquest@hotmail.com



Advertising Widget
468x60
 

Please wait ...