By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
River flow input meeting set
Placeholder Image

The State Water Resources Control Board last week rescheduled public hearings to receive input on a proposal to allocate 40 percent of unimpaired flows along the Tuolumne River for fish and wildlife.

Beginning in November and concluding in January, there will be five public hearings in Sacramento, Stockton, Merced and Modesto. The Modesto meeting is set for 9 a.m. on Tuesday, Dec. 20 in the Modesto Centre Plaza's Tuolumne River Room.

"Right now we're in the middle of a water war," said Stanislaus County Board Supervisor Vito Chiesa. "This is the single greatest threat to the economic viability here in Stanislaus County. Everyone needs to be engaged."
On Sept. 15, the State Water Board released its Substitute Environmental Document for public review and comment. At more than 3,500 pages, this controversial document was given to the public for a 60-day comment period.

The State Water Board proposes increasing flows to provide habitats for fish and wildlife upstream of the Delta from Feb. 1 to June 30 from three tributaries of the lower San Joaquin River and adjusting the salinity requirements to a slightly high level to reflect updated scientific knowledge and protect farming in the Southern Delta.

While the original 2012 document called for a 35 percent release of unimpaired flows, the revised document now calls for a 40 percent release.

Representatives from the State Water Board attended County Board of Supervisors meetings in Modesto and Merced Tuesday to present the proposal and answer questions from the Board - meetings that Chiesa said were long overdue.

"I'm pleased that we finally had an audience with these folks after asking them to come down and talk to locals for literally years," said Chiesa. "It is very late in the process, obviously, but it was good to have them."

During the Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors meeting Tuesday, Chiesa said that there was nearly three hours of public comment and every person who spoke was "pro-Stanislaus County" and against the proposal.

"There was not a single speaker that got up there and said, ‘we love what the State is doing,'" said Chiesa. "This is bad legislation written without the input of local irrigation districts who have been the stewards of water since the 1800s and that's the disappointing part."

For more information, visit