By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Letters to the Editor published July 13, 2011
Placeholder Image
Ceres' anti-Walmart group missing in action

Editor, Ceres Courier,

A relatively new self proclaimed "concerned citizens" group in Ceres faithful attends every public hearing to oppose a proposed Walmart store on the grounds that the project will create way too much new traffic and threaten existing businesses. Yet, this past week the Ceres City Council approved a project that will expand the size of the city to include some 12,000 new residents and millions of square feet of new retail and business property. Yet, this very group did not attend the hearing to protest a project that will have a much greater impact than the Walmart store, hundreds times over. Nope, not a peep from these "concerned citizens"!

When the project comes before the Ceres City Council I am confident that they find the group's selective protest as further evidence that the group are shills for Walmart competitors.

Gladys Boland,


* * * * * * * *

Alarm: New Melones could go dry

Editor, Ceres Courier,

With recent rains filling reservoirs and the above average snowpack in the Sierra, Gov. Jerry Brown declared California's three-year drought officially over on March 31. While the "state of emergency" may be over, the problem is not going away. Anyone who has lived in the Valley for the last decade knows that next year could see a return to below normal rainfalls and snow. Snow in the mountains is critical for the Valley because it is our summer water for homes, businesses, electricity and farming. The snow melts and trickles into streams which empty into our rivers and flows into our reservoirs where some of it is stored until needed by our region while the balance flows to the Delta.

In our area we depend on the Stanislaus River and storage in New Melones and other reservoirs to balance the needs of the region. New Melones is more than a giant water tank; it is a source of fun for boaters, campers, fishers and others who enjoy outdoor recreation. It brings millions of tourist dollars and many in our communities derive their living from the Stanislaus River and New Melones Reservoir.

If drought wasn't enough to worry about, there is another problem that is a "clear and present danger." It is the implementation of a federal ruling called the Biological Opinion (BO) that calls for more water to be released from New Melones down the Stanislaus to supposedly help declining native fish like salmon and steelhead. Putting aside the issue of whether more water going down the Stanislaus will help native fish- it won't-there is the question of what impact more releases will have on New Melones? It is a question that anyone who depends on the Stanislaus and the water behind New Melones should be asking.

For years we at the Oakdale and South San Joaquin Irrigation Districts have been studying the river, its flows and the native fish-spending millions on research to protect the fish population. That research has shown two key factors: first, the problem with declining salmon is predation, not lack of water. Even the National Marine Fisheries Service acknowledges the problem of predation in the Delta. Unfortunately, it's taken a court action to convince the California Department of Fish and Game, who make money selling fishing licenses, of that fact.

The second factor is so serious we must continue to sound the alarm. If the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation - it operates New Melones - continues with the requirements in the BO, which it intends to do, New Melones could be emptied! A simple hydrologic run on the watershed's "yield vs. demand" shows this to be the case going forward 13 out of the next 80 years. No water in the lake. The government's own June 2, 2009 Technical Memo (pg. 72) on the BO admits that these added New Melones flow demands are not sustainable unless the feds can wrestle water away from agriculture on the Tuolumne and Merced rivers, and that's not a guarantee. So without that guarantee in place, they'llcontinue to drain New Melones.

In the mean time, think of what an empty reservoir means to tourism and to businesses that depend on recreational dollars. Draining New Melones will wreck havoc for local businesses, communities and agriculture.

The government says they would never let New Melones go dry, but the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation has no Operations Plan for the reservoir, hasn't produced one and can't say when they'll have one put together to insure this won't happen. Forgive us for being somewhat concerned about the economy of the region and your jobs, but you need to know. The Biological Opinion is based on poor science (another discussion for another time) and needs to be revamped.

We will make it through this year and there is a chance, because of this big winter, that with normal rain/snow we could make it through 2012. What happens beyond that is what concerns us. The BO must be revamped and the Bureau compelled to provide an Operations Plan for New Melones that is sustainable. Until then, we are going to continue to raise the issue, sound the alarm bell and write more to educate more.

- Jeff Shields is the General Manager of the South San Joaquin Irrigation District

- Steve Knell is the General Manager of Oakdale Irrigation District

* * * * * * * *


Letters to the editor will be considered for publication but must be signed with the author's name, address and telephone number. Letters should contain 250 words or less and be void of libelous statements. Letters may be sent to The Ceres Courier, P.O. Box 7, Ceres, CA 95307, or emailed to