Seeing is believing.
People around the country were baffled when exit polls showed Robert or “Beto” O’Rourke won more votes from native Texans than incumbent U.S. Senator Ted Cruz in the midterm elections. But this should not be a surprise, it should be a lesson – some people need to experience socialism to understand its disastrous effects.
Exit polls found that 57 percent of people who moved to Texas voted for Cruz while 51 percent of those born in Texas voted for O’Rourke.
While many Texas conservatives blamed the liberalization of the state on transplants from California and New York moving to the area for lower property values, it seems the opposite is taking place. These people are not bringing their liberal ideas, but running away from them.
Chuck DeVore of The Washington Examiner explains, “The lack of economic freedom in California compared to Texas is likely why, according to census, from 2012 to 2016, a net of 521,052 Californians left the state. Texas was their most popular destination, with a net of 114,413 Californians moving 1,300 miles east to the Lone Star State. In the five years through 2016, some 542,432 more Americans moved to Texas than moved out, supporting a growth rate double that of California’s.”
It seems those who have experienced the socialist policies of high-tax states are fleeing to Texas and voting to keep those taxes and regulations low.
Conversely, youth in Texas have rallied behind O’Rourke, increasing youth turnout by 500 percent in the midterm election.
For the youth and those unexposed to progressive policies, increasing government spending with expanded Medicare and free tuition seem like good ideas. But for those who just left a state burdened by these policies, they are reprehensive to reinstitute them.
Nationally, this can also be seen by some immigrant groups who tend back the Republican Party after legally entering the country to escape socialism at home.
In Florida, Cuban voters have historically leaned right, and in 2018 tended to pick Ron DeSantis for governor and Rick Scott for senator – the Republican picks.
Similarly, Russian immigrants – particularly Russian-speaking Jews who grew up under Soviet rule – backed Donald Trump in 2016 and rejected progressive Democrats like Bernie Sanders.
Janna Sundeyeva told the Atlantic in 2016: “I don’t like big government… I would ask [left wingers]: Have you ever lived under a revolution? Do you know what it’s like? When someone comes and takes your family member in the night?”
Another Russian immigrant simply said, “To defend the country from Hillary, I would vote [for] a dinosaur.”
Immigrants who have experienced the harm of big government policies and socialism that strip individuals of their rights overwhelmingly lean Republican so as to avoid bringing that danger to this country. Individuals living in high tax, big government states are fleeing to low tax, individual liberty-based states. The pattern is the same – those who know socialism, know it does not work. Yet the Left is working tirelessly to convince young voters there is a chance for the socialism to bloom here in the United States, it is critical the populations who have experienced this harm work to prevent that from coming true.
Natalia Castro is the multimedia director at Americans for Limited Government.