Editor, Ceres Courier,

Californian politicians often debate wealth inequality, but a more important question is overlooked: Who decides how wealth should be distributed?

Wealth is often the result of effort, discipline and risk-taking. If outcomes are equalized regardless of effort, the incentive to work hard and innovate weakens.

While some argue that unequal starting points limit success, focusing too heavily on redistribution can ignore personal responsibility. Providing support is important, but it should not replace the value of hard work.

The real issue is not inequality itself, but how to encourage both opportunity and accountability. A fair system should reward those who strive while still allowing others the chance to rise.

Jahnavi Kannan

LETTERS POLICY: Letters will be considered for publication but must be signed and include an address and phone number. Letters should be 250 words or less and be void of libel. Send to The Ceres Courier, 138 S. Center Street, Turlock CA 95380 or emailed to jeffb@cerescourier.com.