Editor, Ceres Courier,
For a passenger train system that is years away from being completed, California High Speed Rail sure is carrying lots of baggage. We can thank its long history of disjointed planning for the many budgetary and infrastructural setbacks.
Agricultural, municipal and environmental groups are up in arms over HSR route issues that adversely affect water, crops, livestock, wildlife and scenic plant life. From infrastructure to commerce, jobs and longevity of living things; there are many reasons why Congressman Jeff Denham requires an HSR plan, and prioritizes overall rail system needs while demanding fact-based answers.
Neither CHSRA nor Amtrak's High Speed Rail system plans meet the congressman's established criteria that emphasize safety, quality and affordability. Any effort by CHSRA and Amtrak to combine their respective budgets (or increase purchasing power for train sets) would likely be a failed effort. This is because their respective regions would require separate and exorbitantly expensive train designs.
Nevertheless, if Denham favors $6 billion in NE corridor infrastructure improvements, it could help CHSRA and Amtrak to connect, combine their respective budgets, and see if a high speed savings miracle occurs!
LETTERS POLICY: Letters to the editor will be considered for publication but must be signed with the author's name, address and telephone number. Letters should contain 250 words or less and be void of libelous statements. Letters may be sent to The Ceres Courier, 138 S. Center Street, Turlock CA 95380 or emailed to firstname.lastname@example.org